Peste 4 milioane de titluri în engleză și alte limbi! Descoperă-ți noua poveste astăzi!

Află starea comenzii

Contactați-ne

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy

Autor: Mitchel De S.-O.-L'E. Lasser

Limbă:

Legare: Carte broșată

Editura: Oxford University Press

Disponibilitate: șansă 50%

Şanse de a obține acest titlu

373.49 lei

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassat...

Informații despre carte

Autor

Mitchel De S.-O.-L'E. Lasser

Limbă

engleză

Legare

Carte - Carte broșată

Publicat

2009

Pagini

402

EAN

9780199575169

ISBN

0199575169

Enbook ID

04533331

Editura

Oxford University Press

Greutate

584

Dimensiuni

236 x 159 x 27

Descriere completă

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed comparative examination of the interpretive practice of the European Court of Justice. Lasser demonstrates that the French judicial system rests on a particularly unified institutional and ideological framework founded on explicitly republican notions of meritocracy and managerial expertise. Law-making per se may be limited to the legislature; but significant judicial normative administration is entrusted to State selected, trained, and sanctioned elites who are policed internally through hierarchical institutional structures. The American judicial system, by contrast, deploys a more participatory and democratic approach that reflects a more populist vision. Shunning the unifying, controlling, and hierarchical French structures, the American judicial system instead generates its legitimacy primarily by argumentative means. American judges engage in extensive debates that subject them to public scrutiny and control. The ECJ hovers delicately between the institutional/argumentative and republican/democratic extremes. On the one hand, the ECJ reproduces the hierarchical French discursive structure on which it was originally patterned. On the other, it transposes this structure into a transnational context of fractured political and legal assumptions. This drives the ECJ towards generating legitimacy by adopting a somewhat more transparent argumentative approach.

Cele mai căutate

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Produse

Produse

Cele mai căutate

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Produse

Produse

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy

Informații despre carte

Descriere completă

S-ar putea să te intereseze

Angelina; OR, L'amie inconnue

TOM CLANCY LINE OF DEMARCATION

Never Wake

Haddock Or Halibut?

International Trade Theory

Blackstone's Guide to the Equality Act 2010

Jumpstart Your Bookkeeping Business

If I Were the Antichrist...

Job-Embedded Professional Development

In a World Created by a Drunken God

Applying Fuzzy Mathematics to Formal Models in Comparative Politics

Automating the Design of Data Mining Algorithms

Clienții care au cumpărat această carte au mai cumpărat și

Spiegelbilder

Abrázame, mamá

Bleach - Brennendes Schlachtfeld

Industriemeister Sageindustrie - Das prufungsrelevante Wissen

Deutsche Heldensagen

E-learning jako prostředek pro rozvoj cizojazyčného akademického psaní v anglick

De grenzen van duurzaam partnerschap. Deel V

You're My Cutie! 03